California Attorney General Rob Bonta and Secretary of State Shirley N. Weber have filed a petition for writ of mandate with the California Fourth District Court of Appeal in Santa Ana regarding Huntington Beach's voter identification law, Measure A. This measure, which amends the city’s charter to allow voter ID requirements at municipal elections starting in 2026, has been challenged by state officials who argue it conflicts with state law.
On November 15, 2024, the Orange County Superior Court determined that the lawsuit against Huntington Beach was “not ripe for adjudication,” as Measure A is described as "permissive and discretionary" and does not currently conflict with state election laws. In response, Attorney General Bonta and Secretary Weber appealed on January 14, 2025. They are now urging the appellate court to resolve the case on its merits rather than focus solely on procedural issues related to ripeness.
Attorney General Bonta stated, “Secretary Weber and I continue to believe that Huntington Beach’s Measure A is unlawful. Today, we are asking the appellate court to hear our case on the merits now, instead of waiting." He emphasized that "the right to vote is sacred," highlighting concerns about disenfranchisement.
Secretary of State Weber expressed her commitment to protecting voting rights: “As California's chief elections officer, I stand with Attorney General Bonta in challenging local government actions that violate state law and diminish the right to vote.” She underscored her dedication to an inclusive democracy.
The petition outlines several reasons why immediate action is necessary:
- The state lacks an adequate remedy through other legal means.
- The matter holds significant statewide importance affecting upcoming elections.
- It presents a new legal question under California's Constitution concerning local versus state authority.
- Prompt resolution could prevent numerous similar appeals.
The lawsuit filed by Bonta and Weber claims Measure A conflicts with existing state laws designed to ensure electoral integrity and protect voters' rights. According to them, while charter cities can manage municipal affairs under California’s Constitution, they cannot enact measures conflicting with matters of statewide concern such as election integrity.
A copy of their petition is available for public review. If denied by the appellate court, further proceedings may address ripeness issues separately.