Quantcast

Elder fraud remains priority for Northern District of Ohio USAO

LEGAL NEWSLINE

Tuesday, January 7, 2025

Elder fraud remains priority for Northern District of Ohio USAO

Attorneys & Judges
Webp uhbr6f7e7arzypgg4t1rxqrzak1f

U.S. Attorney Rebecca C. Lutzko | U.S. Department of Justice

The United States Attorney’s Office (USAO) for the Northern District of Ohio continues to prioritize combatting elder fraud. This initiative, part of the Department of Justice's Elder Justice Initiatives, focuses on addressing elder abuse, neglect, financial fraud, and scams targeting senior citizens. These schemes can range from identity theft to large-scale mail fraud operations that defraud elderly victims across the nation.

U.S. Attorney Rebecca Lutzko emphasized the importance of prosecuting those who exploit seniors' trust: “Many fraud crimes that target our elderly population involve criminals taking advantage of this group’s trusting nature. Fraudsters falsely claim to be government officials or promise to help with computer issues, persuading victims to provide fraudsters with access to their personal information,” she stated.

In 2024, several notable cases highlighted these efforts:

- In U.S. v. Alahmad, a caregiver forged documents to misuse an elderly victim's financial resources, resulting in a 30-month prison sentence and restitution of $46,064.30.

- U.S. v. Xie involved a college student acting as a "money mule," transferring funds from older victims across the country. He received a 16-month prison sentence and was ordered to pay $188,000 in restitution.

- The case of U.S. v. Wehman saw a defendant sentenced to 37 months for wire fraud against his grandfather, with restitution set at $376,069.46.

- In U.S. v. Turnipseede, approximately 72 investors were defrauded out of over $8.5 million through a Ponzi scheme involving sports wagering businesses.

- U.S. v. Alexander focused on cold-calling schemes targeting older investors with deceptive tactics related to wine and whiskey investments; Alexander received three years probation and must pay $202,195.58 in restitution.

- Defendants in U.S. v. Mangukia posed as customer service employees and manipulated victims into converting cash into cryptocurrency or purchasing gold bars.

- A similar approach was seen in U.S. v. Chaudhary where defendants deceived victims into withdrawing cash under false pretenses.

- Finally, in U.S. v Kai., social media was used to lure victims into investing in cryptocurrency through misleading transactions.

Beyond legal actions, USAO staff engaged in public outreach initiatives aimed at educating communities about elder fraud scams through various events and platforms.

For reporting such crimes, individuals are directed to visit https://tips.fbi.gov/home or https://www.justice.gov/elderjustice/financial-exploitation.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

More News