FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (Legal Newsline) - Former President Donald Trump failed to raise any new issues that would reopen his defamation case against CNN, which he says compared him to Adolf Hitler while he fought the results of his 2020 loss to President Joe Biden.
Florida federal judge Raag Singhal made that ruling on Dec. 5 in Trump's lawsuit. Singhal had tossed it earlier this year, and Trump's lawyers filed a motion for reconsideration in August.
Singhal wrote a motion for reconsideration should raise new issues, not address those litigated previously.
"Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is well-written and well-reasoned but does not raise issues of manifest error," Singhal wrote.
"Nor has Plaintiff set forth reasonable grounds for amending his complaint when Plaintiff never moved to amend prior to dismissal. Plaintiff seeks the proverbial 'second bite of the apple' and this the Court cannot grant."
The case said CNN's repeated use of the term "the Big Lie" likened him to Nazis and sought $475 million in damages.
"Trump argues that 'the Big Lie' is a phrase attributed to Joseph Goebbels and that CNN's use of the phrase wrongly links Trump with the Hitler regime in the public eye," Singham wrote when tossing the case.
"This is a stacking of inferences that cannot support a finding of falsehood."
Trump's Aug. 7 motion argued for reconsideration of the ruling under a standard of "the need to correct clear error prevent manifest injustice. It does not allege an intervening change in controlling law or availability of new evidence.
It says Singham was wrong to consider the statements at issue pure opinion. They are actually "mixed-opinion," the motion says.
The case boils down to statements made in five publications that fought back against Trump's claims the 2020 election was rigged for now-President Joe Biden.
In some of them, the term "Big Lie" is used to describe Trump's stance.
A Jan. 5, 2021, op-ed by a CNN contributor used this term - "This is Trump's 'Big Lie,' a brazen falsehood with momentous consequences."
"'Big Lie' is rhetorical hyperbole and does not refer to Hitler or Nazism," CNN's motion to dismiss said, adding the op-ed was pure opinion supported by unchallenged facts.
An editorial by CNN Editor-at-Large Chris Cillizza said: "One can only hope that Trump was unaware that his quote was a near replication of this infamous line from Nazi Joseph Goebbels: 'If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.'"
CNN says this passage "merely compares two quotes" and is not defamatory.
Judge Singham compared Trump's claims to those made by the Church of Scientology against the mayor of a Florida city who said the church was bringing a "helter-skelter world and philosophy" to the city. CNN had brought up the case in its motion to dismiss.
The church sued over the phrase "helter-skelter," which is forever linked to Charles Manson.
"Like Trump and CNN personalities Ashleigh Banfield and Paul Steinhauser, the Court finds Nazi references in the political discourse (made by whichever 'side') to be odious and repugnant," Singham wrote.
"But bad rhetoric is not defamation when it does not include false statements of fact. CNN's use of the phrase 'the Big Lie' in connection with Trump's election challenges does not give rise to a plausible inference that Trump advocates the persecution and genocide of Jews or any other group of people.
"No reasonable viewer could (or should) plausibly make that reference."