Legal Newsline

Friday, April 10, 2020

Delaware court dismisses most of plaintiffs' claims in suit over $40 million Pro Performance Sports asset sale

State Court

By Charmaine Little | Oct 21, 2019


WILMINGTON, Del. (Legal Newsline) – A Delaware court has denied in part and granted in part a motion to dismiss a case concerning a $40 million transaction that was claimed to be unfair.

Vice Chancellor Kathleen S. McCormick of the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware ruled in JJS LTD, PPS Investors LTD LP and John Sarkisian’s case against Steelpoint CP Holdings LLC, Pro Performance Sports LLC, James Caccavo, Garrett Potter, Timothy Broadhead, Timothy Wiseman and Does 1 through 20 on Oct. 11. The judge granted dismissal of five of the plaintiffs' claims for failure to state a claim but did deny to dismiss the breach of fiduciary duty claim.

The plaintiffs sued after the board of managers for Pro Performance Sports LLC approved an asset sale for $40 million in cash. The issue came considering the LLC agreement called for the company’s senior preferred unitholder to receive all of the sale consideration, leaving the common unitholders dry, the ruling states. Three of those common unitholders sued, challenging the fairness of the transaction.

While the plaintiffs said the transaction with Implus was a violation of their voting rights as it was a major member decision subject to Section 9.13 of the operative LLC agreement, the defendants argued that the section in question doesn’t greenlight a separate class vote to common unitholders in said major member decisions. 

“Evaluating the whole text of Section 9.13 shows that the drafters intended to convey special rights concerning major member decisions to the Series A Preferred Unitholder …," McCormick wrote. "Because two of the major member decisions listed in Section 9.13 provide unique rights concerning the Series A Preferred Unitholder, it is sensible that the first clause be interpreted to vest the Series A Preferred Unitholder with unique class voting rights, as defendants argue.”

The plain language detailed in the section calls for the court to select the defendants’ interpretation that major member decisions have to be approved by the Series A Preferred Unitholder (which in this case is Steelpoint) and by the majority of holders of the combined total of the Series B Preferred Units, the Series C Preferred Units, and the Voting Common Units. Considering this, the court dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims concerning breach of Section 9.13.

McCormick also dismissed the plaintiffs’ breach of information rights claim, pointing out that the plaintiffs failed to display the special circumstances that would allow them to impose their inspection demand at this phase of the case.

The plaintiffs also failed to convince McCormick that they were victims of the defendants’ breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The plaintiffs alleged the defendants breached the implied covenant of the Operative LLC Agreement when they piloted the transaction with Implus in a way that was unjust to the plaintiffs as they didn’t align with plaintiffs’ books and records request. 

“Plaintiffs have failed to identify any gap in the operative LLC agreement," McCormick wrote. "...Because the operative LLC agreement sets contractual standards by which to evaluate defendants’ conduct, the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is inapplicable to this dispute.”

McCormick went on to address the plaintiffs’ request that the court improve Section 9.13 of the agreement as it relates to fraud or mistake. Yet, the plaintiffs don’t suggest they were victims of fraud, or that there was a “mutual mistake between parties,” McCormick noted.

The judge did side with the plaintiffs on their breach of fiduciary duty claim, as the defendants failed to dispute that the transaction in question was 100 percent fair.

Want to get notified whenever we write about Delaware Court of Chancery ?

Sign-up Next time we write about Delaware Court of Chancery, we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.

Organizations in this Story

Delaware Court of Chancery