SAN JOSE, Calif. (Legal Newsline) - The New York Times wants access to information that was sealed in LIV Golf's antitrust lawsuit against the PGA Tour - litigation recently settled when it was announced the competing leagues would merge.
The case presents important issues in which the public has a legitimate interest, lawyers for the newspaper wrote in a June 16 motion to intervene in the case. Golfers who took deals at LIV like Phil Mickelson and Bryson DeChambeau sued the PGA Tour in California federal court, alleging the PGA Tour used its power to squash competition from LIV.
In turn, the PGA Tour said LIV's lack of success came from the fact it was funded by Saudi Arabia, given criticism of corruption and human rights abuses in the country.
In the end, the two put their differences aside to merge but that doesn't mean what was disclosed to the court under seal should stay secret forever, the New York Times says.
"(A)t issue are claims that a foreign state, using the immense power and wealth of a sovereign investment fund, may have tortiously interfered with a United States enterprise - and, apparently, arguments by those counterclaim defendants that they are not subject to the full jurisdiction of U.S. Courts," the Times wrote.
"As the court previously has held, who controls LIV goes to the heart of the merits of the counterclaim thus rendering the public interest in access to the information especially great."
Relevant records to whether the Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia and its governor, Yasir Al-Rumayyan, misled the California court, like LIV's shareholder agreement, remain sealed, the Times wrote.
"Only adding to these interests are President Trump and members of his former administration's close business ties to LIV Golf and PIF and the political and diplomatic impact of Saudi Arabia's involvement," the motion says.
"These are precisely the kinds of public concerns - allegations of harm to the public, affecting an international sport, implicating a sovereign state and the court's jurisdiction - that weigh heavily in favor of disclosure."
A hearing on the Times' motion is scheduled for Aug. 3 before Judge Beth Labson Freeman.