Quantcast

LEGAL NEWSLINE

Wednesday, May 1, 2024

Judge gives preliminary OK to $9.5M settlement over Vizzy hard seltzers

Federal Court
Vizzy

SAN FRANCISCO (Legal Newsline) - A San Francisco federal judge has no qualms with a proposed class action settlement in a lawsuit alleging the vitamin C claims on Vizzy hard seltzers mislead drinkers.

Judge William Orrick on March 10 gave his preliminary approval to the agreement, in which Molson Coors has agreed to pay $9.5 million. From that amount, lawyers are set to take $2.5 million.

The settlement would end lawsuits filed in California, Illinois and Florida by Gutride Safier, Sheehan & Associates and The Wright Law Office. A hearing on final approval of the settlement will be conducted in July, after any objectors have a chance to voice their opinions.

The settlement is on behalf of a nationwide class and would resolve claims under California, Pennsylvania, Colorado, New York, Illinois, Mississippi, South Carolina, Louisiana, Arkansas and Florida laws.

The settlement includes an injunction that will take the vitamin C claims off the packaging. Class members who kept their receipts or other proofs of purchase will get $5 per 24 pack, $3 per 12 pack and $.75 for single cans.

"All claimants that submit a valid claim are entitled to a minimum cash payment of $6," the settlement says. "However, the actual cash payment received may be reduced pro rata depending on the number of valid claims and the cost of other expenses paid out of the settlement fund."

Without a receipt, class members can claim a maximum of $15 per household. For incentive awards to the named plaintiffs, the settlement would pay a total of $35,000.

Lawyers would take an additional $70,000 from the settlement fund for their out-of-pocket expenses.

Attorneys for Molson Coors had argued reasonable customers would not think drinking a hard seltzer is healthy or the same as eating a piece of fruit.

“This argument ignores the FDA’s own guidance that fortification of alcoholic beverages could be false and misleading,” Orrick wrote when denying the company's motion to dismiss.

“It also ignores the disputes of fact about how reasonable consumers would interpret the phrase ‘with Antioxidant Vitamin C from acerola superfruit.’ As plaintiffs point out, that statement is prominent on all of the Vizzy packaging and featured prominently in marketing materials to distinguish Vizzy from its competitors.”

More News