Legal Newsline

Friday, April 3, 2020

Here are the names of lawyers whose TV ads are scaring and lying to viewers, according to the FTC

Hot Topics

By John O'Brien | Oct 11, 2019


WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline) – The Federal Trade Commission says lawyers and legal advertisers looking for plaintiffs to sue drug companies are making false claims in their TV ads, as well as possibly scaring viewers into stopping taking their medications.

And records obtained Friday by Legal Newsline identify companies that are producing the commercials that the FTC has major concerns with. The FTC announced seven letters in September but did not initially disclose to whom they were sent.

The FTC says some commercials are possibly misleading viewers about the existence of recalls of particular medications.

Some commercials also severely overstate the likelihood of side effects, it says. For instance, the FTC says a study referenced on one ad actually showed an insignificant increase in instances of gastric cancer for people who use drugs like Nexium - despite the ad making the situation sound much more dire.

The law firms and other companies that received letters from the FTC in September are Sokolove Law; Pulaski Law Firm; Ketterer Browne; Lucy Business Services; Matthews and Associates; Amicus Legal Group; and MCM Services Corp.

Below are summaries of each letter.

Lucy Business Services

Lucy Business Services, of California, has trademarked Knightline Legal and looks for Nexium, Prilosec and Prevacid users.

“STOMACH CANCER WARNING” flashes on-screen at the beginning of its commercial.

“A recent medical study found that the prolonged use of both prescription and over-the-counter proton-pump inhibitors may double a patient’s risk of developing stomach cancer,” the ad says.

“Thousands of acid reflux patients may have been exposed to serious risk by these dangerous medications.”

But the FTC says only four of 10,000 proton-pump inhibitor users developed gastric cancer, according to the study referenced by the ad.

That amounts to only a .043-percent increase in risk.

“Accordingly, the implication that the study establishes that prolonged use of PPIs poses a substantial risk of stomach cancer appears to be false,” the FTC wrote.

MCM Services Corp.

MCM advertises under the name Gold Shield Group and is looking for Invokana users, as well as Abilify users. That drug has been linked to strange side effects like uncontrollable gambling.

“We note that the FDA has stated that the reported impulse-control problems from Abilify, including an uncontrollable urge to gamble, are rare,” the FTC said.

“Accordingly, the implication that Abilify poses a substantial risk of uncontrollable gambling appears to be false. In addition, this ad may convey that the risks from taking Abilify outweigh its benefits.

Gold Shield Group runs ads regarding the leukemia drug Tasigna, too. They say there is a link to amputation, blood clots, heart attack and stroke.

“To prevent consumer injury… an ad might need to disclose, clearly and conspicuously, that consumers should not discontinue their medications without seeking the advice of their physician,” the FTC said.

Sokolove Law

At issue for Sokolove is an ad looking for users of the diabetes drug Invokana. It says:

“Attention, diabetics. The FDA warns that the Type 2 diabetes drug Invokana is linked to an increased risk of leg and foot amputations.”

The FTC says this could lead viewers to believe that the FDA has warned patients to stop taking the drug. It also says viewers could be led to believe that the risk is “substantial” and outweighs the benefits of taking Invokana.

“Moreover, in some circumstances, a lawsuit ad that causes or is likely to cause viewers to discontinue their medications may constitute an unfair act or practice,” the letter says.

Invokana has caught the attention of the lawyer advertising community. Research provided by X Ante, using Kantar CMAG data, shows lawyers and lead-generators spent an estimated $5.3 million on Invokana ads in the first nine months of 2019.

Lawyers say Invokana is linked to ketoacidosis and kidney injuries. It has not been recalled, but the Food and Drug Administration did issue a safety warning.

Pulaski Law Firm

Pulaski, of Houston, similarly runs Invokana ads.

“Based on new data from two large clinical trials, the FDA has concluded that Type 2 diabetes medicines Invokana, Invokamet and InvokametXR causes an increased risk of leg and foot amputations,” the ad says.

The FTC makes the same plea for Pulaski to review its ads that it does to the others.

“Reasonable consumers might interpret an ad with these elements as a government-sanctioned medical alert or another type of public service announcement,” the letter says.

Matthews and Associates

Matthews and Associates is also in Houston and also runs Invokana ads. Its commercials mention the risk of genital gangrene associated with SGLT2 inhibitors like Invokana.

“We note that the FDA describes gangrene of the genital area as a rare side effect,” the FTC said.

Matthews and Associates ad says patients using SGLT2 inhibitors were about twice as likely to develop gangrene that leads to leg and foot amputations.

“If you or someone you love has been diagnosed with one of these conditions, you may be entitled to compensation,” the ad says.

Ketterer Browne & Anderson

Ketterer Browne, of Maryland, is another firm making a play for Invokana clients. The letter to it is similar as the ones Pulaski, Sokolove and Matthews and Associates.

“Attention, people with diabetes! The FDA has just issued a warning that Invokana may cause an increased risk of amputations. If this has happened to you or a love one, call right now. You may be entitled to substantial compensation,” the ad says.

The beginning of the ad is possibly a sensational alert that misleads viewers about the ad’s sponsor, the FTC said.

Amicus Legal Group

Amicus Legal Group, of California, seeks Xarelto and Pradaxa users. Its ad tells viewers to “listen closely. You could be at serious risk.”

It goes on to say a report estimates tens of thousands will suffer major bleeding events requiring hospitalization and more than 4,000 might bleed to death after taking Xarelto.

Xarelto spending used to dominate the drugs and medical devices field studied by X Ante. In an 18-month span in 2015-16, there were 168,000 Xarelto ads.

Ultimately, more than 27,000 Xarelto lawsuits were part of a global settlement of $775 million. Johnson & Johnson and Bayer settled despite overwhelming success in the first six trials.

“Your ad begins with a prominent ‘DRUG WARNING,’ a call to ‘Attention,’ and a warning that consumers who take Xarelto or Pradaxa ‘could be at serious risk,’” the FTC wrote.

“Reasonable consumers might interpret an ad with these elements as a government-sanctioned medical alert or another type of public service announcement.”

A few years ago, an FDA official reported that 61 people stopped taking their Xarelto or Pradaxa after seeing commercials from lawyers. Of that group, six people died – three from strokes, one from cardiac arrest, one from a pulmonary embolism and one from an unreported cause.

The American Medical Association even adopted a policy in 2016 that attorney commercials should include “appropriate” and “conspicuous” warnings.

From Legal Newsline: Reach editor John O’Brien at

Want to get notified whenever we write about any of these organizations ?

Sign-up Next time we write about any of these organizations, we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.

Organizations in this Story

Matthews & AssociatesSokolove LawPulaski Law Firm PLLCUS Federal Trade Commission