Quantcast

Campground gets victory over family who sued after tree limb fell on them

LEGAL NEWSLINE

Tuesday, December 24, 2024

Campground gets victory over family who sued after tree limb fell on them

State Court
Campsite

WILMINGTON, Del. (Legal Newsline) – A campground sued by a family who filed a personal injury claim against it after a tree fell was granted its motion for summary judgment by a Delaware court.

On Sept. 12, Judge Calvin L. Scott Jr. of the Superior Court of the State of Delaware sided with Big Oaks Trailer Park Inc., doing business as Big Oaks Campground, and Boyer’s Tree Service in Scott and Danielle Stephenson’s lawsuit against them. The Stephensons sued individually and as guardian ad litem for minor daughters Ava and Lillian Stephenson.

The ruling states the Stephensons were camping on Big Oaks’ property in 2015 when a huge tree limb at their campsite broke and fell on their camp area. The plaintiffs alleged they were hit by parts of the tree and sustained physical and mental injuries. The plaintiffs alleged that Big Oaks was negligent when it didn’t sufficiently inspect and remove trees.

Big Oaks Trailer Park sought to exclude testimony from the plaintiffs' liability expert Russell Carlson, arguing that he was not qualified because he is an arborist and not a campground manager. 

"There is no question that Russell Carlson's testimony would help the trier of fact understand the extent of the latent damage to the oak tree of which plaintiffs allege defendant should have been aware," Scott wrote. "But plaintiffs have offered Mr. Carlson to show how defendant breached his duty. As an arborist, Mr. Carlson is not qualified to give an opinion on a campground owner's duty of care."

The plaintiffs alleged that if Big Oaks Trailer Park had called an arborist, it would have known of the tree's weaknesses.

"Whether this is true or not, it is not the correct standard," Scott wrote. 

"By failing to identify an expert to establish the duty which defendant owed to plaintiffs and to show how defendant breached that duty, plaintiffs have not set forth sufficient evidence to support essential elements of their prima face case. In viewing the facts in a light most favorable to the plaintiffs, the court finds that defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law."

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

More News