Quantcast

Jeep owner alleges she paid for WS Aftermarket Services contract and later learned vehicle was not eligible

LEGAL NEWSLINE

Saturday, November 23, 2024

Jeep owner alleges she paid for WS Aftermarket Services contract and later learned vehicle was not eligible

Lawsuits
General court 09

shutterstock.com

NEWARK, N.J. (Legal Newsline) – A Middlesex County, New Jersey woman alleges she paid more than $2,000 for a vehicle service plan for a vehicle and later learned her vehicle was not eligible for coverage.

Grazyna Nowak filed a complaint on Dec. 19 in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey against WS Aftermarket Services Corp. and Warranty Solutions Management Corp. over alleged violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and New Jersey Punitive Damages Act.

According to the complaint, on April 16, 2016, Grazyna Nowak and her son purchased a Jeep vehicle in New Jersey and purchased a third-party vehicle service contract through the defendants at the dealership. The plaintiff alleges she was charged $2,550 plus tax for the WS service contract.

The plaintiff alleges she later learned that the Jeep was manufactured to be registered in Canada, not the U.S., and the defendants would not provide any coverage because of this.

The plaintiff holds WS Aftermarket Services Corp. and Warranty Solutions Management Corp. responsible because the defendants allegedly failed to ensure that the Jeep was in fact eligible for coverage under the WS service contract and failed to provide coverage for later necessary repairs to the Jeep.

The plaintiff requests a trial by jury and seeks declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, treble and actual damages, pre- and post-judgment interest, and such other and further relief as the court deems equitable and just. She is represented by Bharati O. Sharma of The Wolf Law Firm LLC in North Brunswick, New Jersey.

U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey case number 2:18-cv-17379-KM-JBC

More News