Legal Newsline

Monday, April 6, 2020

$19M verdict against BNSF stands; Mo. SC rejects argument juror concealed that she had filed wrongful death suit


By Kyla Asbury | Jun 11, 2018


JEFFERSON CITY. Mo. (Legal Newsline) – The Supreme Court of Missouri has affirmed a jury verdict in a case against BNSF Railway Co. over the alleged wrongful death of a Missouri man.

Judge Paul C. Wilson authored the May 22 opinion, wherein he, along with Zel M. Fischer, George Draper, Mary Russell and Patricia Breckenridge agreed with the Stoddard County Circuit Court. Judges W. Brent Powell and Laura Denvir Stith disagreed.

According to the opinion, Sherry Spence filed a lawsuit against the railway company after her husband was killed in 2012 when he was crossing railroad tracks and the train owned by BNSF struck the truck he was in.

Spence’s late husband allegedly was unable to see the train approaching when he arrived at the crossing due to vegetation blocking his view. Spence alleged the railway company failed to cut the vegetation back. Spence also claimed the railway company employees failed to slow or stop the train when it approached the intersection.

The railway company argued that Spence’s late husband was at fault for attempting to cross at the railroad crossing when a train was approaching the crossing.

The suit was presided over by Circuit Judge Stephen R. Mitchell. It went to trial in 2015 and a jury found that the railway company was in the wrong. It assessed fault at 80 percent to the company for failing to maintain the crossing and 15 percent to the crew members for their failure to slow or stop the train. The jury said the decedent was 5 percent at fault.

The jury returned a verdict award of $20 million. The circuit court later reduced the award to $19 million. The railway company asked for a new trial, which was denied. The railway company then appealed to the Supreme Court.

The opinion states the railway company claimed in its appeal that one of the jurors, Kimberly Cornell, failed to inform counsel that she had been a party in a wrongful death lawsuit involving the death of her son, who was killed in an accident.

The railway company claimed its attorneys asked multiple times in different ways if the possible jurors had been involved in litigation regarding wrongful death and every time, Cornell did not speak up that she had.

Due to a misspelling on Cornell’s juror information sheet, the railway company’s attorneys did not catch that she had been involved in a wrongful death lawsuit, the opinion states.

BNSF also disagreed with how certain things were written on the verdict form, including Instructions Nos. 7 and 8. The railway company also argued Spence’s attorney mentioned the removal of American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) sight tables in her opening statement, which the railway company then moved for a mistrial, but that was overruled.

The railway company believed mentioning the sight tables was an error, but the Supreme Court wrote Spence’s attorney could reference them even if they weren’t directly relevant to her negligence claim.

In his dissent, Powell wrote that he didn’t believe the railway company had waived its right related to Cornell’s non-disclosure.

Powell wrote that the railway company properly raised the issue with the non-disclosure as soon as it was made aware of the issue.

The Supreme Court ruled that the circuit court was not in the wrong by denying the railway company’s motion for a new trial.

Supreme Court of Missouri case number SC96195

Want to get notified whenever we write about Missouri Supreme Court ?

Sign-up Next time we write about Missouri Supreme Court, we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.

Organizations in this Story

Missouri Supreme Court