WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline) - A recent study says medical liability reform at the state level reduced
total health care premiums by 2.6 percent, and that if those same reforms were
made on a national level, insured Americans could save more than $15 billion.
American Action Forum - a Washington, D.C., think tank that
studies the economy, domestic policy and health care, among other things - released the study in October as part of its ongoing health care research. Sam
Batkins, Director of Regulatory Policy at American Action Forum and co-author
of the study, said it shows reforms in health care can directly impact consumer’s
pockets and the government's budget.
“So much money goes to health care,” Batkins told Legal Newsline. “For a state that has Medicaid
increasingly taking up a stake in its budget, a 2 percent to 3 percent decline in costs
is tens of billions of dollars in savings.”
Batkins said they started reviewing the data after examining health
care costs in general. They decided to look at the impact medical liability
reform, specifically medical malpractice, was having on premiums around the country,
and started analyzing costs for states that passed some regulatory measures
versus states that had not.
What they found was even some regulations decreased health
care premiums paid by employers and employees. And while the average percentage
seemed small – 2 percent to 3 percent – Batkins said when it comes to health care
costs, that’s a huge number.
“Fifteen billion is pretty large,” he said. “But when you
consider that the nation spends roughly a trillion combined on health care, it
doesn’t seem like much.”
Their study also reinforced similar data released in 2013 by
the Congressional Budget Office that limiting medical malpractice torts could
reduce mandatory federal spending by $57 billion during the next 10 years,
increase revenues by $6.7 billion and reduce discretionary outlays by $1.8
Batkins said medical tort reform is largely a bipartisan
issue. In 2009, President Barack Obama advocated for some reforms, though he
declined to support a cap on malpractice awards. Republicans tend to favor
reform more than Democrats. The American Action Forum’s study found it was
mostly in states with Republican governors that passed tort reform and saw
costs go down, including Michigan, Texas and Florida.
“There’s been an increased focus in red states,” he said. “It’s
a realization that regulations generally operate like taxes. In the same way
that the Republicans are interested in reducing taxes and simplifying the tax
burden, just as high taxes are a concern to a lot of conservatives, it’s the
same in this case.”
With more and more research coming out showing the economic
impacts of increasing reforms, Batkins said he wouldn’t be surprised if more Democrats
start pushing for it on the state and federal level. Without tort reform, it’s
costing the nation $300 billion annually and that number continues to grow.
“I don’t know that Democrats will suddenly jump on board,”
he said. “But I do think that the more we hear about health care costs
escalating, they’ll at least be more open to trimming those costs.”