LegalNewsLine Logo  
Monday, March 15 2010     Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ Federal jury finds fraud on part of asbestos lawyers
+ W.Va. SC won't rehear controversial $50M case
+ Murnane: Illinois med-mal caps bill likely to die
+ Brief argues against liability expansion in asbestos suits
+ Brown says his Medi-Cal fraud division has recouped $209 million
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Bankruptcy
+ Big Pharma
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Financial Crisis
+ Gasoline Prices
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Personal Injury
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
State Supreme Courts 
 
W.Va. SC sends Ohio plaintiff packing
Benjamin
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (Legal Newsline) - Having a West Virginia-based attorney who received communications from an insurance company does not mean an out-of-state plaintiff can file suit in West Virginia, the state Supreme Court recently ruled.

Frank Savarese, of Yorkville, Ohio, and his Wheeling lawyer argued that their suit against Allstate Insurance Co. could be filed in Wheeling, even though Savarese's original suit, filed over an automobile accident, was filed in Ohio.

Savarese sued Allstate for compensatory and punitive damages in 2006 because it allegedly failed to make payments for his medical treatment. During the first suit, Allstate routinely e-mailed his attorney, David Jividen.

"The claim was adjusted in offices located in Hudson, Ohio, and Birmingham, Ala. Any decisions involving whether to pay or to deny benefits under the policy were made at these locations," Justice Brent Benjamin wrote.

"The decisions were then simply communicated to the plaintiff's attorney, but they were already finalized before they were communicated.

"A mere communication to an attorney that a decision has been made, without more, cannot confer subject matter jurisdiction. To find differently would put the Defendants in a situation where they would either have to 1) submit to jurisdiction anywhere a claimant hires an attorney simply because they have a duty to communicate with the attorney, or 2) refuse to send correspondence to a claimant's attorney in order to preserve their jurisdictional defenses, but possibly give rise to additional bad faith claims for failure to communicate."

Justice Larry Starcher dissented and reserved the right to file an opinion of his own.

The Ohio County Circuit Court in Wheeling also sided with Allstate. Savarese claimed that because communications between his attorney and Allstate occurred primarily in Wheeling, that the part of West Virginia law that says a suit can be filed there when "all or a substantial part of the acts or omissions giving rise to the claim" was satisfied.

"(W)e now hold that the retention by Mr. Savarese, an Ohio resident, of a West Virginia attorney to pursue medical payment claims under an Ohio insurance contract for an injury sustained in Ohio is insufficient to establish venue under W. Va. Code § 56-1-1(c) for a cause of action governed by Ohio law arising from the denial of payment of such medical claims where no party to the action is a West Virginia resident," Benjamin wrote.

From Legal Newsline: Reach John O'Brien by e-mail at john@legalnewsline.com.

Filed Under: State Supreme Courts


COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!

SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:


* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
This Is CAPTCHA Image
Write the characters in the image above: 

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ W.Va. SC won't rehear controversial $50M case - 3/11  
+ W.Va. Senate OKs business court plan - 3/10  
+ Tort reformer: N.J. SC's jurisdiction decision a dangerous one - 3/10  
+ Voters want candidates to use taxpayer money in W.Va., poll shows - 3/8  
+ New judge for Fourth Circuit - 3/3  
+ Calif. chief justice laments court closures - 2/24  
+ Colorado's Amendment 54 declared unconstitutional - 2/23  
+ Business court plan moves ahead in W.Va. - 2/19  
+ Justice Moreno: Arbitration becoming 'judicialized' - 2/18  
+ Iowa court allows casino to withhold winnings - 2/17  


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Most of the judges on the New Mexico Court of Appeals get a failing grade when it comes to the "expansion of liability," according to a judicial evaluation report.
Read more...


+ 'Land of Enchantment' in 'Hellhole': Tort reform group calls New Mexico's appeals court 'pro-liability' - 3/2
+ Group puts the brakes on Honda class action settlement - 2/23
+ AG Brown, feds sitting out whisteblower suit against pipemaker - 2/18
+ Calif. AG hopeful vows to target public employee pension increases - 2/12
+ Nebraska AG Bruning's political star rising - 2/5
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
LATEST LNL BLOG ENTRIES:
+ Abbott: Beware Dietary Supplement Scams and 'Miracle' Health Claims
+ Abbott's signs of a scam
+ AG McCollum on convicts in the mortgage industry
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here

NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.