MILWAUKEE (Legal Newsline) -- The State Bar of Wisconsin wants to limit state Supreme Court justices to one, 16-year term in office.
Currently, voters elect justices to 10-year terms with no limit on the number of terms that can be served.
On Tuesday, one of the authors of the proposed constitutional amendment spoke at a Marquette University law school program, "On the Issues with Mike Gousha."
Milwaukee attorney Thomas Shriner said a term limit would help reduce outside political influence on the state's high court.
"We would not have the idea that incumbent justices would be looking over their shoulders to see whether the people who would be giving them money at the next election approve of the way that they're deciding things," he said.
Re-election campaigns in the state have become increasingly expensive and politically charged.
In response, the State Bar of Wisconsin's Board of Governors voted to support the proposed amendment, which was recommended by the bar's Judicial Task Force.
Under the proposal, the governor would continue to appoint justices when a vacancy occurs. However, that justice still would face an election.
The proposed change wouldn't happen until at least 2016. A constitutional amendment has to pass the state legislature in two consecutive sessions before being put on a statewide ballot.
From Legal Newsline: Reach Jessica Karmasek by email at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Calif. jury awards $4.5 million to plaintiff in case against hip implant maker
- MDL panel decides to consolidate Lumber Liquidators class actions
- MDL established for Anthem data breach class actions
- One class action against AAMCO dismissed, under mediation while another remains
- La. AG's antitrust suit against Pfizer relying on private attorneys, campaign donors
- N.M. AG defends decision to pursue nursing service providers, use outside counsel
- N.J. lawmakers argue role of AG is ‘important’ one, needs to be elected
- Software company claims Microsoft continues to infringe on ‘out-of-band’ patents
- Miss. SC denies utility’s request for rehearing on refund ruling
- Goodlatte’s Innovation Act passes House committee, with some tweaks