LegalNewsLine Logo  
Saturday, March 20 2010     Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ AG Tom Miller lands in GOP crosshairs
+ Settlement reached over nutritional supplement enrollment plan‏
+ Brown gets polluting hair products taken off store shelves
+ Whitman leads Brown in latest poll
+ Texas medical malpractice law survives challenge
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Bankruptcy
+ Big Pharma
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Financial Crisis
+ Gasoline Prices
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Personal Injury
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
U.S. Supreme Court 
 
U.S. Supreme Court sides with white firefighters in race bias case
U.S. Supreme Court building
WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline)-The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that white firefighters were unfairly denied promotions because of their race.

The case comes from a 2004 lawsuit filed by 18 firefighters who allege they were denied a move up the command ranks of the New Haven, Conn., fire department because they were not members of a minority group.

The firefighters said their rights to equal protection as well as their protections under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were trampled when the city threw out their test scores on a promotional exam because no African-American candidate received a high enough score to also be considered for the same promotion.

The U.S. Supreme Court sided with the firefighters.

"Whatever the City's ultimate aim -- however well intentioned or benevolent it might have seemed -- the city made its employment decision because of race. The city rejected the test results solely because the higher scoring candidates were white," Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the court's 5-4 majority.

For its part, the city argued that allowing the test scores with such wide racial discrepancies could have violated federal law and opened the city to being sued by minority test-takers.

"Fear of litigation alone cannot justify an employer's reliance on race to the detriment of individuals who passed the examinations and qualified for promotions," Kennedy wrote.

At trial, U.S. District Judge Janet Bond Arterton in New Haven sided with the city, saying none of the plaintiffs were harmed since no one was promoted. She said the decision to disregard the test results affected all applicants equally.

"New Haven did not race-norm the scores (to favor minority candidates), they simply decided to start over," the judge said. "While the evidence shows that race was taken into account in the decision not to certify the test results, the result was race-neutral: all the test results were discarded."

A three-judge panel of the New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision, and later refused a rehearing of the case.

In a statement, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said the decision should not reflect poorly on President Barack Obama's pending Supreme Court nominee, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Sonia Sotomayor.

"It would be wrong to use today's decision to criticize Judge Sonia Sotomayor, who sat on the panel of the Second Circuit that heard this case but did not write its unanimous opinion," Leahy said. "Judge Sotomayor and the lower court panel did what judges are supposed to do, they followed precedent. It is notable that four justices would have upheld the Second Circuit's ruling, including the retiring Justice Souter, who Judge Sotomayor is nominated to replace."

The city of Chicago in March paid a $6 million settlement to 75 white firefighters who said they lost promotions when their test scores were tossed out in 1986.

The case is Ricci v. DeStefano, No. 07-1428

From Legal Newsline: Reach staff reporter Chris Rizo at chrisrizo@legalnewsline.com.

Filed Under: U.S. Supreme Court


COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!

SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:


* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
This Is CAPTCHA Image
Write the characters in the image above: 

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Carp crisis discussed at justices' weekly meeting - 3/19  
+ Justice Stevens mulls retirement - 3/16  
+ High court to decide if vaccine makers can be sued - 3/8  
+ Court ends long-running Cisco lawsuit - 2/26  
+ U.S. justices rule in closely watched civil jurisdiction case - 2/23  
+ U.S. high court allows $600 million class action against bond hou... - 2/23  
+ Tobacco companies seek Supreme Court review of racketeering verdi... - 2/22  
+ Legislation introduced in response to U.S. SC decision - 2/11  
+ Souter to address Harvard graduates - 2/9  
+ Delaware asks U.S. SC to hear sports-betting appeal - 1/28  


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Most of the judges on the New Mexico Court of Appeals get a failing grade when it comes to the "expansion of liability," according to a judicial evaluation report.
Read more...


+ 'Land of Enchantment' in 'Hellhole': Tort reform group calls New Mexico's appeals court 'pro-liability' - 3/2
+ Group puts the brakes on Honda class action settlement - 2/23
+ AG Brown, feds sitting out whisteblower suit against pipemaker - 2/18
+ Calif. AG hopeful vows to target public employee pension increases - 2/12
+ Nebraska AG Bruning's political star rising - 2/5
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
LATEST LNL BLOG ENTRIES:
+ Abbott: Beware Dietary Supplement Scams and 'Miracle' Health Claims
+ Abbott's signs of a scam
+ AG McCollum on convicts in the mortgage industry
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here

NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.