LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, September 7 2008     Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ August not a good month for Internet travel company
+ Washington court rules against arbitration clause
+ Brown joins fight over Orange County deputies' pensions
+ Ohio AG partners with FBI on raid on pharmacy
+ Door-to-door sales company settles with Calif. again
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Gasoline Prices
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Personal Injury
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
+ Tort Reform
State Supreme Courts 
 
Calif. justices to review $82 million verdict against Ford
SAN FRANCISCO(Legal Newsline)-The California Supreme Court has agreed to review an $82.6 million verdict awarded after a 2002 rollover accident left a woman paralyzed.

The decision continues the legal odyssey of this case that has bounced between the California courts for more than five years.

The high court last week granted Ford Motor Company's petition for review of the state appeals panel's refusal to reduce the $55 million punitive damages part of the verdict, or to grant a new trial.

The San Diego appeals court had been ordered by the United States Supreme Court to review the punitive damages in light of a smoker's lawsuit against cigarette maker Philip Morris that said punitive damages couldn't be based on harm to people not involved in the court case.

Despite the order from the court, the appeal court reaffirmed its punitive award, saying there was no evidence the Ford jury based its award on harm to outside people.

Ford's legal reply to the San Diego appeals court decision claims a "series of fundamental misstates" that need to be reconsidered.



Filed Under: State Supreme Courts


COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!

SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:


* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
This Is CAPTCHA Image
Write the characters in the image above: 

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Nevada justices block three tax-related ballot petitions - 9/5  
+ Conn. SC gives Blumenthal power to progress antitrust probe - 9/4  
+ W.Va.'s 'out-of-state' debate continues in DuPont saga - 9/4  
+ Missouri court decision 'encourages' forum shopping - 9/3  
+ Michigan SC hears controversial ballot measure case - 9/3  
+ Wills moving from Ark. AG's office to Supreme Court - 9/2  
+ County judge to announce run for Michigan Supreme Court - 9/2  
+ Washington court rules against arbitration clause - 9/2  
+ Texas SC: Landowner cannot seek damages from subsurface trespass - 9/2  
+ Michigan justices agree to hear arguments on government overhaul ... - 8/29  


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
Friday, August 29, 2008
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (Legal Newsline) - When House Bill 104 passed during the first Special Session of this year's state Legislature, it did so with little fanfare. Yet it represents to date the single act of oversight the Legislature has enacted over the state Attorney General's office.

Read more...


+ Election spotlight shines on W.Va. AG race - 8/22
+ Call for AG reform growing - 8/15
+ Oxycontin case divides McGraw's fans, foes - 8/8
+ McGraw has taken outside counsel idea to new heights - 8/1
+ Low-profile judge thrust into the spotlight - 7/30
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
LATEST LNL BLOG ENTRIES:
+ AG McCollum on convicts in the mortgage industry
+ Synagro's response to Pa. AG candidate's remarks about sludge
+ Pa. AG candidate: Corbett's sludge stance on side of corporations

NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.