LegalNewsLine Logo  
Saturday, July 4 2009     Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ U.S. Supreme Court sides with white firefighters in race bias case
+ U.S. Supreme Court: State AGs may probe national lending practices
+ King: Rethink GM bankruptcy plan
+ McKenna argues against federal preemption of consumer laws
+ Obama says Supreme Court 'moving the ball' on affirmative action
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Bankruptcy
+ Big Pharma
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Financial Crisis
+ Gasoline Prices
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Personal Injury
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
U.S. Supreme Court 
 
U.S. Supreme Court rejects smoker's lawsuit
WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline)-The U.S. Supreme Court rejected an appeal Monday by a California smoker who alleged the $206 billion tobacco settlement between 46 states and the four major cigarette companies violated antitrust laws.

As a part of the multi-state settlement, Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson and Lorillard Inc. agreed in November 1998 to pay the states to settle claims by the states for smoking related costs they incur.

Without comment, the nation's high court declined to hear the case that Steve Sanders brought originally in June 2004, when he sued the four tobacco companies and the state of California.

Sanders argued that the terms of the agreement effectively penalized tobacco companies if they gained market share.

He said in court papers that tobacco companies would have to make larger payments to the states if they cut prices and increased their sales relative to their rivals.

As a result, cigarette companies were able to raise their prices in tandem to pay for the settlement, he said.

By raising the price of a carton of cigarettes by $12.20 between 1998 and 2002, he said the tobacco companies were able to rake in $20 billion in profits annually, or more than double the amount they were required to pay the states under the settlement.

He said the multi-state agreement "effectively established a horizontal cartel that eliminated all incentive to increase market share or to compete on price."

His claims were dismissed by a federal district court and by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.

The tobacco companies and the state of California responded to the lawsuit, saying that the settlement agreement is exempt from antitrust law, as are most actions by states.

California Attorney General Jerry Brown said in court filings that tobacco companies that didn't participate in the settlement increased their market share five years afterward, from .5 percent to 8.2 percent, while the four leaders saw their share drop from 96.5 percent to 84.5 percent.

Named in the lawsuit are Philip Morris USA, a unit of Altria Group Inc.; Brown & Williamson Holdings Inc., a unit of British American Tobacco PLC, Lorillard Tobacco Co., a unit of Loews Corp.; and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a unit of Reynolds American Inc.

The case is Sanders v. Brown et al, 07-995.

From Legal Newsline: Reach reporter Chris Rizo by e-mail at chrisrizo@legalnewsline.com.


Filed Under: U.S. Supreme Court


COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!

SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:


* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
This Is CAPTCHA Image
Write the characters in the image above: 

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Obama says Supreme Court 'moving the ball' on affirmative action - 7/2  
+ U.S. Supreme Court: State AGs may probe national lending practice... - 6/29  
+ U.S. Supreme Court sides with white firefighters in race bias cas... - 6/29  
+ U.S. high court sides with seaman in Jones Act case - 6/25  
+ U.S. SC sees no need to review Mass. decision - 6/22  
+ U.S. Supreme Court sides with mining company - 6/22  
+ Kennedy calls on Stanford graduates to spread justice - 6/14  
+ McConnell says Sotomayor filibuster a possibility - 6/14  
+ Bush defends Sotomayor nomination - 6/12  
+ Chrysler LLC sold after Supreme Court hold lifted - 6/10  


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
Monday, June 29, 2009
WASHNGTON (Legal Newsline) - The federal government plans to withhold nearly a half-million dollars the next time it doles out Medicaid funding to the State of West Virginia as a result of a settlement engineered by state Attorney General Darrell McGraw.
Read more...


+ The Libby verdict: Did the judge play favorites? - 6/2
+ Sotomayor can expect plenty of scrutiny - 5/26
+ The Libby verdict: Prosecutors make a fatal mistake - 5/21
+ California judge accuses asbestos firms of playing 'grisly games' - 5/5
+ GOP calls for outside counsel reform in wake of Rendell controversy - 4/23
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
LATEST LNL BLOG ENTRIES:
+ Abbott: Beware Dietary Supplement Scams and 'Miracle' Health Claims
+ Abbott's signs of a scam
+ AG McCollum on convicts in the mortgage industry
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here

NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.