LegalNewsLine Logo  
Sunday, September 7 2008     Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ August not a good month for Internet travel company
+ Washington court rules against arbitration clause
+ Brown joins fight over Orange County deputies' pensions
+ Ohio AG partners with FBI on raid on pharmacy
+ Door-to-door sales company settles with Calif. again
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Big Pharma
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Gasoline Prices
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Personal Injury
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
+ Tobacco
+ Tort Reform
Hot Topics 
 
MTBE settlement could grow, lawyers say
Scott Summy
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (Legal Newsline)--Oil companies have agreed to pay $422 million in clean up costs to settle lawsuits over their use of MTBE, a gasoline additive blamed for contaminating water supplies.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs say the payout could grow. A lot.

In addition to the initial cash settlement, the companies agreed to pay 70 percent of the cost to treat any new contaminated wells.

That part of the agreement covers some 3,000 where MTBE has never been detected. More than one-third of those wells are in California: See below

"It just depends on how many of those wells get hit in the future, which nobody really knows. But certainly it's very expensive to clean this stuff up," Scott Summy, the plaintiffs' lead attorney, told Legal Newsline.

"If you had 5 percent of them get hit, that could get very expensive," added Summy, a partner with the Baron & Budd law firm in Dallas.

MTBE, or methyl tertiary butyl ether, was used in gasoline to make it burn cleaner and reduce air pollution. But the chemical began showing up in ground water. At low levels, it gives water an offensive taste and odor.

Because of its unique chemical properties, MTBE can get into ground water quickly and spread much farther than other additives, such as ethanol, which is also used for the same purpose.

Soil won't absorb MTBE, and the chemical has an affinity for water and will flow with underground currents.

"In some instances it can travel several miles, Summy said. "If you have a water well nearby that's pumping, it'll pump the contamination into the well."

Plaintiffs, who are water companies whose wells have had MTBE detected in them, call the second part of the settlement a kind of insurance policy. If the chemical shows up in another well, lawyers explained, they can collect without having to return to court.

"It was kind of a mutual thing," Summy said, explaining how the deal emerged.

"These defendants, I've sued them a number of times now. They know that wells get hit in the future. At the same time my clients don't want to sue them again. Everyone's realizing there's a lot of MTBE left in the ground out there."

Attorneys say its almost impossible to put an upper limit on the potential cost if more contamination is found. It could also be nothing.

"It's kind of like a bet," said Vic Sher, who also represented plaintiffs in the case.

The oil and chemical companies, he said, believe MTBE is a solved problem, or that it will be soon.

If they're right, they won't have to pay any more to the 156 water companies with whom they just settled (other cases remain open).

However, if they're wrong, and MTBE continues to find its way into wells, the costs could rise quickly.

"The cost can range in general terms from one million dollars for a small well with low levels (of MTBE) that won't last long, to tens of millions for a large well with high levels that last a long time," Sher said in an interview from San Francisco.



California companies received the largest portion of the settlement.

In all, 11 California plaintiffs will receive more than $78 million, plus potential future treatment of nearly 1,100 wells, including:
California Water Service Co. ($49.7 million; 27 currently contaminated wells; 786 future wells)


Riverview Water District ($11.4 million; 4 currently contaminated wells; 3 future wells)


California American Water Co. ($8.03 million; 3 currently contaminated wells; 184 future wells)


M&P Silver Family Partners (San Diego County); $3.9 million; 2 contaminated wells; 0 future wells)


Quincy Community Services District ($2.66 million; 1 currently contaminated well; 5 future wells)


City of Riverside ($1.01 million; 4 currently contaminated well; 100 future wells)


Citrus Hts Water District ($264,000; 0 currently contaminated well; 5 future wells)


Del Paso Manor Water District ($264,000; 0 currently contaminated well; 8 future wells)


Fair Oaks Water District ($264,000; 0 currently contaminated well; 9 future wells)


Florin Resource Conservation District ($264,000; 0 currently contaminated well; 15 future wells)


Rio Linda Elverta Water District ($264,000; 0 currently contaminated well; 12 future wells)




Filed Under: Hot Topics


COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!

SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:


* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
This Is CAPTCHA Image
Write the characters in the image above: 

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Calif. lawsuit challenges McCain candidacy - 8/13  
+ Ohio's economic climate improved by new judges, report says - 8/6  
+ Calif. court ruling favors employers in meal break dispute - 7/29  
+ Legal heavyweights seek to protect Calif. judges - 7/15  
+ Orange County judge ousted - 6/27  
+ Former plaintiffs' attorney to lead Calif. Judges Association - 6/11  
+ Report: Weiss shortchanged shareholders - 5/28  
+ Arkansas holds non-partisan judicial races today - 5/20  
+ Class action filed against KeyBank over student loans - 5/14  
+ Reporter asked to leave hearing in Colossus class action - 5/14  


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
Friday, August 29, 2008
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (Legal Newsline) - When House Bill 104 passed during the first Special Session of this year's state Legislature, it did so with little fanfare. Yet it represents to date the single act of oversight the Legislature has enacted over the state Attorney General's office.

Read more...


+ Election spotlight shines on W.Va. AG race - 8/22
+ Call for AG reform growing - 8/15
+ Oxycontin case divides McGraw's fans, foes - 8/8
+ McGraw has taken outside counsel idea to new heights - 8/1
+ Low-profile judge thrust into the spotlight - 7/30
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
LATEST LNL BLOG ENTRIES:
+ AG McCollum on convicts in the mortgage industry
+ Synagro's response to Pa. AG candidate's remarks about sludge
+ Pa. AG candidate: Corbett's sludge stance on side of corporations

NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.