LegalNewsLine Logo  
Tuesday, March 16 2010     Subscribe in NewsGator Online
News | Contact LegalNewsline | About Us | Advertise | RSS
Enter search keyword
 
NEWSLETTER
Receive our FREE weekly newsletter
click here
LNL MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
+ W.Va. SC won't rehear controversial $50M case
+ Federal jury finds fraud on part of asbestos lawyers
+ Poll: Brown, Whitman neck-and-neck
+ Obama nominates McConnell to federal bench
+ AG Tom Miller lands in GOP crosshairs
LNL HOT TOPICS
+ Asbestos
+ Bankruptcy
+ Big Pharma
+ Class Action
+ Dickie Scruggs
+ Financial Crisis
+ Gasoline Prices
+ Global Warming
+ Hurricane Katrina
+ Lead Paint
+ Personal Injury
+ Sub-Prime Mortgages
State Supreme Courts 
 
Conn. SC backs Blumenthal in suit against Marsh & McLennan
Norcott
Blumenthal
HARTFORD, Conn. - Connecticut's Supreme Court recently gave Attorney General Richard Blumenthal the ruling he needs to proceed with his suit against insurance broker Marsh & McLennan.

The Court decided Wednesday Blumenthal is allowed to request compensation for damage done to the state's economy in his suit against Marsh, which alleges bid-rigging and contract steering in the insurance industry.

"The Court preserved a powerful, potent weapon to fight violations of antitrust laws," Blumenthal said. "This law allows my office to strongly and severely punish illegal and anticompetitive business practices that ripple through the state economy, stealing hard-earned dollars from consumers and honest businesspeople."

A lower court had agreed with Marsh's argument. The company claimed the general economic damages claimed by the state, specifically a diminution of funds available to circulate throughout the state's economy, were the same as damages claimed by allegedly affected businesses. It also said a monetary figure would be nearly impossible to calculate.

The High Court unanimously disagreed with Marsh, ruling that a federal law that prevents such claims did not prevent Blumenthal from doing so. Only Connecticut, Virginia and Nevada have laws allowing them to seek damages for their states' economies in antitrust cases, Blumenthal said.

"In our view, the defendants' arguments with respect to the potentially duplicative nature of the damages and injuries pleaded in the State's complaint implicate potential problems of proof rather than pleading," Justice Flemming Norcott wrote.

"It is well settled that antitrust injury and damages may be determined by statistical models explained by expert testimony...

"Thus, although the defendants may be correct that the State's economic models are unable to separate its claimed general economy damages from those recoverable under (state antitrust law), it nevertheless would be premature for us to make that determination on the pleadings alone before any discovery has been conducted."

Former New York Attorney General and Gov. Eliot Spitzer, recently involved in a prostitution scandal, publicized his battle against Marsh & McLennan while Attorney General. His lawsuit led to an $850 million settlement.

The company was also sued by Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann. Blumenthal's suit was filed in 2005.

Filed Under: State Supreme Courts


COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!

SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:


* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
This Is CAPTCHA Image
Write the characters in the image above: 

E-mail this article to a friend | Printer friendly format

MORE NEWS HEADLINES:
+ Del. SC's stance on medical monitoring debated - 3/16  
+ S.C. justices overturn $18M Ford verdict - 3/15  
+ Texas medical malpractice law survives challenge - 3/15  
+ W.Va. SC won't rehear controversial $50M case - 3/11  
+ W.Va. Senate OKs business court plan - 3/10  
+ Tort reformer: N.J. SC's jurisdiction decision a dangerous one - 3/10  
+ Voters want candidates to use taxpayer money in W.Va., poll shows - 3/8  
+ New judge for Fourth Circuit - 3/3  
+ Calif. chief justice laments court closures - 2/24  
+ Colorado's Amendment 54 declared unconstitutional - 2/23  


IN THE SPOTLIGHT:
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Most of the judges on the New Mexico Court of Appeals get a failing grade when it comes to the "expansion of liability," according to a judicial evaluation report.
Read more...


+ 'Land of Enchantment' in 'Hellhole': Tort reform group calls New Mexico's appeals court 'pro-liability' - 3/2
+ Group puts the brakes on Honda class action settlement - 2/23
+ AG Brown, feds sitting out whisteblower suit against pipemaker - 2/18
+ Calif. AG hopeful vows to target public employee pension increases - 2/12
+ Nebraska AG Bruning's political star rising - 2/5
BROWSE BY STATE:
 
BROWSE BY AG:
 
BROWSE BY DATE:
 
LATEST LNL BLOG ENTRIES:
+ Abbott: Beware Dietary Supplement Scams and 'Miracle' Health Claims
+ Abbott's signs of a scam
+ AG McCollum on convicts in the mortgage industry
NEWS WIDGET:
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here

NEWS | CONTACT LEGALNEWSLINE | ABOUT US | ADVERTISE | RSS © 2008 LegalNewsLine.com. All Rights Reserved.